Ramsar
Convention on Wetlands / MedWet
5th meeting of the Mediterranean Wetlands Committee, Izmir, Turkey, 12-15 June 2003
MedWet/Com5
Izmir,
Turkey 12-15 June 2003
Technical Workshop
Water use, agriculture and the integrated basin-scale management of wetlands
Conclusions and Recommendations:
[reprinted from http://www.medwet.org/ismir/final.htm]
1. Background and context
Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) have recognized that to achieve their commitments to the conservation and sustainable use of the worlds wetlands, it is essential to ensure that the full and varied range of the functions and values of wetlands are understood and appreciated.
Furthermore, the sustainable management of wetlands can only be achieved by the integration of wetland management into broader-scale planning and management and by mainstreaming wetland issues into other environmental management sectors. To this end, Ramsar Contracting Parties at COP7 (1999) adopted guidelines for the integration of wetland conservation and wise use into integrated river basin management (Resolution VII.18) and at COP8 (2002) guidance on wetlands and integrated coastal zone management (Resolution VIII.4).
At COP8 Parties emphasized that to achieve the sustainable management and use of wetlands it is essential to address the drivers of change to wetlands those other sectoral activities that affect and restrict the capacity of wetlands to continue to deliver their goods and services to people and biodiversity. To address this it is vital to achieve a wider understanding of relationships between water (and the use of water) and wetlands, notably that wetlands are not only users of water but also the providers and purifiers of water for many uses and are depended on by many peoples often including the poorest sectors of society.
To respond to these challenges, at COP8 Parties to the Ramsar Convention adopted a number of decisions concerning water, agriculture and wetlands, notably:
· Guidelines for the allocation and management of water for maintaining the ecological functions of wetlands (Resolution VIII.1);· The Report of the World Commission on Dams (WCD) and its relevance to the Ramsar Convention (Resolution VIII.2);· Guidelines for rendering the use of groundwater compatible with the conservation of wetlands (Resolution VIII.40);· The impacts of natural disasters, particularly drought, on wetland ecosystems (Resolution VIII.35);· Agriculture, wetlands and water resource management (Resolution VIII.34) and· Guiding principles for taking into account the cultural values of wetlands for the effective management of sites (Resolution VIII.19);
as well as a number of more general guidance relevant to water resource management for wetlands, including on management planning and the restoration and rehabilitation of wetlands.
The Conventions Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP) is now preparing further guidance for COP9 (2005) on water-related issues, notably on environmental flows and groundwater management. The STRP has also recognized the cross-cutting nature of agriculture-related issues in relation to the full range of its work in preparing guidance on wetland conservation and wise use.
For countries in the Mediterranean Basin, the challenges of securing the future of wetlands are particularly great, since the region faces increasing water demand for agriculture, drinking and industrial uses at a time when water supply is becoming increasingly scarce because of the increasing severity and duration of droughts. It is recognized that in many parts of the region water demand and use now outstrip supply, and that current rates of abstraction of both surface and ground waters are unsustainable. Without innovative and collaborative action, drawing upon the expertise of all those seeking to tackle the issue, this situation is likely to deteriorate further.
2. The MedWet/Com5 Technical Session
Participants in MedWet/Com5 met in a half-day technical session on Saturday, 14 June 2003, to consider these critical issues for the Mediterranean environment, and to identify priorities for future action which could be undertaken through the Mediterranean Wetland Initiative. MedWet, as a regional initiative of the Convention involving the governments of all countries in the region and the Palestine Authority and other organizations with activities relevant to wetland conservation and wise use, is uniquely placed to confront this challenge.
To inform the discussions and to highlight issues, expert presentations on different aspects of the topic were made on:
· Agriculture and wetland interactions (David Molden and Rebecca Tharme, International Water Management Institute)· The mitigation of the environmental impacts of irrigated agriculture (Assou Mohammi, North African Wetland Network)· Legal and socio-economic interactions of wetlands and water management (Christine Navarro, consultant)· The cultural and agricultural heritage of Mediterranean wetlands (Maria José Vinãls, SEHUMED), and· A project concept for MedWet Initiative work on water use, agriculture and wetlands (Nejib Benessaiah, MedWet Coordination Unit).
A background paper on irrigated agriculture issues, focusing on the South and East Mediterranean countries and prepared by the MedWet Coordination Unit, was also available.
Participants then sought to identify the key issues and challenges needing future attention to secure the sustainable use of Mediterranean wetlands, as well as the priorities for addressing these within the remit of the Ramsar Convention and MedWet Initiative. They developed recommendations for elements of potential project development and implementation which could be undertaken by the MedWet Coordination Unit in collaboration with other components of the MedWet Team, IWMI and other expert organizations.
3. Key issues
It was recognized that the inter-linkages between wetlands, water and agriculture are highly complex, with many sectoral stakeholders. Thus, there is a wide range of issues which need to be tackled if the aim of securing wetland wise use is to be achieved through collaborative cross-sectoral understanding and change in damaging management practices, including perverse incentives.
The majority of key issues listed below were recognized as common to the whole, or a significant part of, the Mediterranean Basin, i.e. they are of concern for many Parties in the region.
It was understood that many of these issues are outside the scope of direct intervention or activity through the MedWet Initiative, but agreed that it is essential to recognize those drivers of change (pressures) in wetlands which affect the business of securing wetland conservation and wise use.
In the listing below, for convenience the issues have been grouped under eight thematic sections, although there are many links and associations between the issues. Issues in each thematic section are further grouped under three categories: a) Pressures the drivers of change in wetland ecosystems; b) Status issues concerning improving knowledge and understanding, including through improved assessment, of the present situation; and c) Responses issues concerning the need for improved policy and/or management actions to address the pressures. Issues partly or wholly dependent on international cooperation are indicated with (I). Within each theme, issues are not listed in any order of priority.
3.1 Integrated Water Resources Management (including assessment, management, monitoring, implementation)
Pressures
· Water scarcity, exacerbated by increasing and persistent droughts.· Over-abstraction of water resources.· Construction of large dams, their impacts in the Mediterranean Region. (I)· Lack of effective cross-sectoral partnerships in water resource management.
Status
· Assessment of the environmental water needs of wetlands.· Assessment and monitoring of the different water uses in the basin.· Assessment of impacts associated with the construction and operation of large dams in the Mediterranean Region. (I)· Monitoring of groundwater levels, as an indication of the degree of use of groundwater resources.· Monitoring of surface water quantity and quality.· Development of a uniform wetlands monitoring strategy for the Mediterranean Region. (I)
Responses
· Addressing the lack of integrated, sustainable management of water resources, at both local and international levels. (I)· Ensuring integrated water resources management as a key element in the conservation and wise use of wetland ecosystems in internationally shared (transboundary) river basins. (I)· Taking an ecosystem approach to integrated river basin management. (I)· Adoption of a participatory approach to ensure effective stakeholder participation.· Educating stakeholders on wetland values and functions.· Improving transparency in water management decision-making.· Improving inter-sectoral collaboration in integrated water resources management.· Enhancing inclusion of land use planning in the process of assessing and managing basin water resources.· Improving land use patterns.· Better allocating water resources between wetlands and agriculture, including development of methodologies and mechanisms for analysis and negotiation of tradeoffs between the multiple uses of water for appropriate basin-level allocation of water resources, specifically including the integration of agriculture and ecological water needs.· Developing mechanisms for the implementation of environmental water allocations for wetlands and for monitoring the effects of implementation.· Integrating assessment of water quantity and quality issues, rather than treating each issue separately.· Integrating groundwater and surface water uses and wetland ecosystem water requirements.· Responding to the absence of post-project monitoring of the efficiency of water resource projects.
3.2 Policy, and legislative and regulatory frameworks
Pressures
· Pricing policy for agricultural products.· Subsidies for intensification of agricultural production.
Responses
· Improving the poor levels of vertical communication and cooperation among different levels of authority, at all levels from local to state and national levels and also inter-sectorally (e.g. among ministries).· Improving inter-sectoral harmonization of policies and legislation.· Improving regional harmonization of policies and legislation, especially for transboundary wetland systems. (I)· Improving agro-environmental policies, including adequate inclusion of the pillar concerning agro-environmental policies, which are very important for wetland conservation, in the current reform of the EU Common Agriculture Policy. (I)· Increasing attention to different wetland types within the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. (I)
3.3 Socio-economics
Pressures
· Low income from agriculture leading to unsustainable agricultural practices.· Competition in trade amongst countries reducing the potential for sustainable agricultural practices. (I)
Status
· Preparation of monetary and non-monetary valuations of wetland goods and services (processes/functions) as an essential tool for the assessment of wetland importance - and to demonstrate to decision-makers the value of and rationale for wetland conservation.
[Note. This links to a key area of wetlands research on how to assess natural wetland functions and to the comparative assessment of the economic value of wetlands and that of agriculture.]
· Assessment of the cost of the water required by wetlands (environmental water requirement).· Examination of water pricing, e.g., tariff structures, revenue collection.· Evaluation of costs and benefits to wetland ecosystems of organic farming (higher value crops).
Responses
· Enhancing the livelihoods of the rural poor.· Providing viable alternatives to agriculture development, especially agricultural intensification, including provision of alternative livelihoods strategies to farmers, e.g., through agro-tourism and eco-tourism.
3.4 Water quality
Pressures
· Irrigation return flows (drainage water).· Increasing and decreasing salinity in different places.· Impacts of application of agro-chemicals pesticides and fertilisers, including nitrate pollution.· Potential for synergistic impacts of agricultural and other forms of water pollution (e.g., industrial effluent, sewage, solid waste).· Use of agrochemicals in wetlands.· Aquifer (groundwater) contamination.
Status
· Identification of pollution sources.· Determination of water quality objectives or standards for contaminants.
Responses
· Re-using wastewater in sustainable and environmentally sound ways, in relation to surface and groundwater.· Addressing the effects of wastewater re-use on groundwater quality and contamination.
3.5 Agriculture practices/systems and water productivity
Pressures
· Water-inefficient agricultural and irrigation practices.· Vulnerability of particular wetland types, such as temporary pools, to existing agricultural practices.
Status
· Reviewing the barriers to the achievement of the sustainable use of water in agriculture.· Further assessment of needs for expansion of irrigation infrastructure.
Responses
· Promoting funding for environmentally sustainable agricultural practices.· Increasing the efficiency of irrigation systems/networks, for the purpose of water saving, e.g., through irrigation technology, repair of old and/or poorly maintained irrigation systems, and appropriate crop selection based on the availability of water resources.· Using less water-demanding crops, particularly around and/or in wetlands.· Using appropriate irrigation systems (e.g., drip, sprinkler, etc.).· Promoting sustainable/traditional agricultural practices that are compatible with wetland conservation, avoiding practices that are liable to alter wetland ecological character.
3.6 Agricultural culture
Responses
· Protection of the different species/varieties of crops used historically, i.e. protection of diversity of genetic resources.· Preservation and promotion of artisanal methods of wetland farming traditionally used in the region. (I)
3.7 CEPA and training
Pressures
· Low institutional capacity and resources, including financial, human and technical, and a need for enhanced training opportunities.
Responses
· Increasing public awareness of wetland-related issues.· Developing a common education strategy or programme on wetland values and functions for the Mediterranean Region. (I)· Transferring scientific information into appropriate formats for the delivery of technical information, e.g. on ecological issues, to non-technical sectors, including managers and decision-makers.
3.8 Research and knowledge exchange
Pressures
· Lack of consistent international and inter-sectoral data collection and measurement standards and protocols. (I)· Lack of cooperation and collaboration between various governmental institutions on data and information exchange.
Status
· Research into techniques for assessing the environmental water requirements of non-riverine wetlands, including groundwater-dependent wetlands.· Research addressing the impact of irrigation on wetlands.· Hydrogeological and hydrological research on wetlands to develop improved understanding of hydrological regimes.
Responses
· Developing a comparative typology of wetland types and types of agriculture, in terms of factors such as ecosystem sensitivity, intensity and scale of farming.· Encouraging better curation and accessibility of relevant information systems, including existing data collections and databases.
4. Recommendations for potential future MedWet Initiative activities
These recommendations identify, in summary, a number of potential topics for programme or project development through the MedWet Coordination Unit, grouped for convenience under a series of thematic headings. In practice, any programmes or projects developed are likely to include several elements from these different themes. The MedWet Coordination Unit should review and identify topics from within this listing for priority development of activities.
4.1 Water management
Water allocation and environmental flows (including groundwater and surface water)
· Monitoring the impact, including from climate change and drought, of agricultural activities on wetland ecosystems.· Addressing the effects of water use in agriculture on wetland functions and values, including biodiversity.· Developing a MedWet methodology for assessing the level required to maintain the natural water flows (quantity and quality) in wetlands.· Promoting practices for minimising water usage.· Developing and applying wetland monetary and non-monetary valuation methodology in relation to agricultural / rural development.· Assessing and managing alien invasive species in relation to agriculture and wetland resources.· Promoting wetland interests when water allocation decisions are being made (at local or basin levels.
Waste water re-use
· Evaluating the effects of treated wastewater on wetlands, e.g., for the restoration of a degraded wetland.
Water management infrastructure
· Assessing the role of dams and reservoirs in maintaining wetland ecosystems.· Establishing interaction with large infrastructure funding organizations.
4.2 Wetlands and agriculture
Policies
· Encouraging improved relations between environmental experts and agricultural people, including through· providing assistance in coordination, management planning, legislation and monitoring in relation to impacts of agriculture on wetlands;· transferring successful examples of agricultural practices, methods and experience which are consistent with wetland wise use; and· providing assistance in decision-making processes for good agricultural practices and development.· Assessing the potential impacts that agricultural trade and pricing policies may have on wetlands, and ensuring that these issues are raised during policy debate.· Reviewing opportunities for establishing a mechanism for the certification of products in relation to wetland wise use, in cooperation with the Ramsar Bureau evaluation of establishing a Ramsar label for wetland products.· Developing and disseminating guidance of the benefits and risks of changing to organic farming.· Assessing impacts of irrigation on wetlands (case studies), leading to proposals for improvement of policy and irrigation practices.· Developing guidance for recommended crop patterns in areas close to wetlands.· Pursuing agriculture-related global issues, e.g., sustainable utilisation of wetland products.
Livelihoods and poverty alleviation
· Assessing the effects and impacts of agriculture on livelihoods of wetland-dependent communities.
Pollution / water quality
· Developing a water quality monitoring programme in relation to agricultural chemicals (fertilizers and pesticides).· Studying the carrying capacity of different wetland types to cope with pollution loads.· Encouraging eco-agriculture so as to decrease the effect of pollution on wetlands.
4.3 Cross-cutting issues
CEPA
· Developing a public awareness programme based on good practice case studies of agriculture and wetlands from Mediterranean countries.· Compiling and disseminating information on all types of cultural values of wetlands.
Culture
· Developing tools and incentives to maintain and preserve traditional agricultural practices that are environmentally and economically sound.· Encouraging the development of ecotourism in wetland agricultural landscapes.
International collaboration
· Developing regional activities which address common problems in the region or subregions, including the issues of funding.
Institutional capacity building
· Reinforcing the regulatory, technical, and institutional tools for a multi-sectoral management.
For
further information about the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, please contact
the Ramsar Convention Bureau,
Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland (tel +41 22 999 0170, fax +41 22
999 0169, e-mail ramsar@ramsar.org). Posted 4 August 2003, Dwight Peck,
Ramsar.