|
The
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
Ramsar
remarks to a joint SBSTA / SBSTTA meeting, November 2005
Address
to
an informal meeting of the CBD SBSTTA and UNFCCC SBSTA, 30 November 2005
by
Peter
Bridgewater, Secretary General
Mr Chairman
It is with great pleasure that i take the floor at this informal gathering
of the two sbst(t)a's to bring to the meeting the views of the Ramsar
Convention, as expressed in recent meetings of its COP.
Firstly, let me underline
the views of the contracting parties to the Ramsar Convention on the issues
of climate change. At the Eighth meeting of the COP in 2002, Parties recognised
that climate change may substantially affect the ecological character
of wetlands and their sustainable use, and understood the potentially
important role of wetlands in adapting to and in mitigating climate change.
In fact wetlands
are consistently under-emphasised in the discussions on carbon sequestration;
they are prime sinks as well potentially considerable sources for carbon.
And while Forests appear to remain the main focus of discussion linking
Biodiversity and Climate change, we should emphasise not only the key
role of wetlands, but also emphasise the complex nature of our global
land and seascape matrix. For it is in the wise management of this matrix
that we can gain in our efforts to mitigate against, and adapt to, climate
change, and the changes it in turn brings in other areas of the natural
world, as well as human well-being.
The Ramsar Conventions'
responsibility and mandate deals with wetland ecosystems and associated
water resources. The convention realises that wetlands are not isolated
2-dimensional islands in the landscape, but are connected by flows of
water, energy and species. This means that actions in wetlands can have
far-reaching effects outside, and that actions in other ecosystems can
affect wetlands. And this includes feedback processes on both biodiversity
and climate change.
We already enjoy
an excellent working relationship with the CBD in delivering elements
of that conventions' programme on inland waters, as well as marine and
coastal and other ecosystems. This relationship works at the COP level,
but perhaps most of all through the SBSTTA framework.
Our COP9 just concluded
reinforced this cooperative approach, and urged me to extend it to UNFCCC
and UNCCD, in part though our observer status on the Joint liaison Group,
as well as with other MEA's in the biodiversity cluster. To paraphrase
the poet, no convention is an island, and we must strive to redouble our
efforts at synergy, from global to national levels.
Looking at the agenda
COP9 set for the next three years there continues to be a need for engagement
with CBD and its SBSTTA through our on-going work, but also in new areas
of work dealing with
The role of the
Ramsar Convention in the prevention and mitigation of impacts associated
with natural phenomena, including those induced or exacerbated by human
activities;
Wetlands and poverty reduction; and
Engagement of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands in ongoing multilateral
processes dealing with water.
Mr Chairman, as you
will see this is an ambitious programme for us, and one which we will
need to work closely with both CBD and UNFCCC. The Ramsar Convention secretariat,
as a member of the Biodiversity Liaison group, also looks forward to working
with sister conventions in the biodiversity cluster in elaborating these
new challenges in conjunction with CBD and UNFCCC colleagues, both through
the SBSTA and COP processes.
Thank you Mr Chairman.
For
further information about the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, please contact
the Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Rue Mauverney 28,
CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland (tel +41 22 999 0170, fax +41 22 999 0169,
e-mail ).
Posted 16 December 2005, Dwight Peck, Ramsar.
 
|