30th Meeting of the Ramsar Standing Committee -- Agenda paper SC30-11
| 30th Meeting of the Ramsar Standing Committee Gland, Switzerland, 13-16 January 2004 |
| Agenda item 10.2 | DOC. SC30-11 |
Small Grants Fund: approval of project proposals for 2003
| Action requested: The Standing Committee is requested to make decisions on the allocation of SGF2003 funds to projects, and to consider the proposed modifications to the SGF Operational Guidelines for 2004 and 2005. |
Income and funds available for allocation
1. In an effort to raise funds for the 2003 round of the Ramsar Small Grants Fund (SGF), the Secretariat wrote in early 2003 to all Ramsar Contracting Parties that are donor countries (as it has done in previous years) soliciting their support. A further request for support, with a list of the projects assessed as feasible by the Secretariat, was sent to donor countries in October 2003, in line with the Operational Guidelines 2003-2005.
2. The contributions received up to 6 November 2003 are shown in Annex 1, which indicates that the funds available for allocation to SGF projects in 2003 amount to SFR 231,699. At the 30th meeting of the Standing Committee the Secretariat will provide an update on the funds available for allocation, should the situation have changed.
Project allocations
3. Following the established procedure, the Secretariat has reviewed and ranked the SGF projects using the approved form for SGF project evaluations. The form has been designed to provide both structure and objectivity to the way in which the Secretariat undertakes its assessment and preparation of recommendations for funding.
4. As required in the SGF Operational Guidelines, in October 2003 the Secretariat circulated its draft SGF 2003 assessment to the Regional Representatives in the Standing Committee from regions from which project proposals have been received, for their consideration and comment.
5. For the 2003 SGF cycle, 48 proposals (13 more than for the SGF 2002 cycle) were received which were administratively complete:
12 from Africa
12 from Asia
12 from Europe
10 from the Neotropics
2 from Oceania
6. It should be noted that, as is customary practice, in order to seek equity of allocations among the Ramsar regions, the Secretariat has prepared its advice on a region by region basis and used this to formulate its overall recommendation by placing the top-scoring projects from each region into the first priority (Category A1) for immediate funding.
7. On the basis of the Secretariat's assessment, as shown in the list of projects by region in Annex 2, the projects have been divided into five categories - A1 and A2; B; C; and D as follows:
(A1) Projects that are technically sound and of highest priority for funding with the funds on hand. This includes six projects: 1 from Africa, 1 from Asia, 1 from Europe, 1 from the Neotropics, and 2 from Oceania . These are:
Mali (SGF/03/ML/03)
Lao PDR (SGF/03/LA/01)
Republic of Moldova (SGF/03/MD/01)
Bahamas (SGF/03/BS/01)
Marshall Islands (SGF/03/MH/01)
Tonga (SGF/03/TO/01)(A2) Projects recommended for funding (in priority order based on the assessment score received by each project) if additional resources should become available for the 2003 SGF cycle. A further SFR 615,289 is required to fully fund all 16 of the A2 projects.
(B) Projects that are technically sound and are of medium priority for funding from the SGF.
(C) Projects that are technically sound but of lower priority for funding from the SGF.
(D) Projects that, on the basis of the information provided, are not considered technically sound or feasible.
8. One country with an A1 rated project (Mali) currently has not yet submitted a final report for an SGF 1996 project. In line with the Operational Guidelines and Resolution VI.5, the Standing Committee should make any approval for funding for this Mali SGF 2003 project conditional on Mali's satisfactory compliance with the reporting requirements from its SGF 1996 project.
9. The Secretariat also notes that for two A1 recommended projects (Mali and Lao PDR) the assessment has noted that some clarifications are needed on elements of the project proposal as submitted, and recommends that the Standing Committee approve these projects subject to the clarifications being satisfactorily made.
10. The Secretariat recommends that the Standing Committee consider establishing, as in previous years, a reserve list of A2-rated projects for priority funding should sufficient additional funds become available from cancelled projects or from other sources. The Standing Committee members may wish to consider whether, as for the selection of A1 projects, projects should be included in the A2 list in a similar geographically equitable manner. If so, then the Secretariat recommends that the following four projects (one from each eligible Ramsar region with A2-listed projects) in order of priority be placed on the reserve list:
Kyrgyz Republic (SGF/03/KG/01)
Guatemala (SGF/03/GT/01)
Kenya (SGF/03/KE/01)
Ukraine (SGF/03/UA/01)
11. Alternatively, if the Standing Committee members consider establishing an A2 reserve list in order of priority of the highest ranked A2 projects, the following six projects are recommended to be placed on the reserve list:
Kyrgyz Republic (SGF/03/KG/01)
Guatemala (SGF/03/GT/01)
Bangladesh (SGF/03/BD/02)
Kenya (SGF/03/KE/01)
Nigeria (SGF/03/NR/01)
Zambia (SGF/03/ZM/01)
12. Several countries with projects on the A2 list have previous SGF projects yet to be completed. As for A1 projects under similar circumstances (see paragraph 8 above), it is recommended that the Standing Committee should indicate that approval for funding for these projects (if additional funds become available) is conditional on satisfactory compliance with the reporting requirements from the country's previous SGF project. Furthermore, the Standing Committee may also wish to recommend that if funds become available for A2 projects, the next country in order of priority which has, by that time, fully complied with reporting on any previous SGF projects should receive the available funding.
Recommendations for amendments to SGF Operational Guidelines
Long-overdue SGF projects
13. The Secretariat wishes to draw to the Standing Committee's attention the fact that there remain a significant number of SGF projects from previous funding cycles which have not yet submitted satisfactory final reports, some of which date back to the 1995 and 1996 SGF cycles. In all there are 22 projects from the 1995-2000 SGF cycles which have yet to be completed (although three of these have now recently submitted final reports which are being evaluated by the Secretariat). In addition there are seven SGF 2001 projects yet to be completed.
14. This means that a substantial sum of funds is being held by the Secretariat for final payments for these incomplete projects - for the 1995-2000 projects, this amounts to SFr. 147,100. This would be sufficient to fund at least three further SGF project proposals.
15. For such overdue projects, the Secretariat regularly seeks contact with the recipients of the project funding to urge completion of their projects. In some cases this results in completion and final reporting on the project, albeit delayed. In other cases, however, despite the Secretariat's attempts to achieve finalization, no response of any kind has been received from the grant recipients, and the Secretariat has no evidence that the project is being, or will be, completed.
16. So as to resolve this matter, it is recommended that the Standing Committee authorize the Secretariat to cancel, at its discretion, an SGF project which has not complied satisfactorily with reporting requirements within three years after the date of signing of the project contract, and for which the Secretariat has received no indication that the project is being implemented to completion. It should be stressed that such a project cancellation would be very much a 'last resort' action, to be applied only if the Secretariat's attempts to support and achieve project completion have failed. The Secretariat considers that it would not be appropriate to make such cancellations automatic, since in some cases the Secretariat agrees, in discussion with the grant recipient, delaying completion of a project owing to unforeseen circumstances which can prevent the anticipated rapid implementation.
17. The Secretariat suggests a three-year period for the completion of projects as well, since for some SGF projects the agreed implementation period is longer than the usual one year period under SGF funding.
18. The Standing Committee may wish also to consider the issue of eligibility for future SGF funding of those countries for which a previous SGF project has been cancelled owing to failure to comply with reporting requirements.
Recommended modifications to Section B "Request for Funding"
19. The Secretariat is finding that a significant number of the SGF project proposals it receives do not have both the required parts of Section B "Request for Funding" of the SGF Operational Guidelines completed.
20. To reduce this difficulty, the Secretariat suggests that the Standing Committee consider approving a simple reorganization of Section B, such that the "Project Summary and Endorsement Form" (currently "Section B continued") is placed before the "Detailed Proposal" guidance.
Recommended modifications to the Project Proposal Assessment Form Stage II
21. In the light of its experience in applying the Assessment Form to SGF projects over the last three assessment cycles, the Secretariat recommends two modifications to the Stage II part of the Assessment Form, which the Standing Committee may wish to consider introducing for the 2004 and/or 2005 SGF cycles.
22. As the SGF has now operated for 13 years, an ever increasing number of countries have now received funding for two or more SGF projects, which means that these countries receive a "0" score in section C of the Stage II assessment. This appears now to be leading to a overall decrease in the assessment scores for some regions, in particular for Europe, where relatively few countries are eligible for SGF support, and it is making it harder to achieve equitability of assessment scoring of high quality projects between regions.
23. So as to reduce this problem, the Secretariat recommends that Stage II Section C be amended such that the scoring would be as follows:
a) No previous projects - 10 points
b) Previously funded one to three times - 5 points
c) Previously funded four times of more - 0 points
24. Concerning section A of Stage II ("Technical quality of project") the Secretariat has now had three years' experience of applying this section introduced by Decision SC25-25 of the 25th meeting of the Standing Committee.
25. As it is currently constructed, this section of the Assessment Form addresses the technical quality of the proposal document itself, with a project scoring high when the budget is well presented, when the relationships between the project's objectives, activities and outputs are clearly presented and linked, and when the proposal includes clear project management procedures. The Secretariat wishes to confirm that inclusion of this assessment section has proved valuable in leading to well-prepared and clearly-presented project proposals being afforded due recognition by gaining a higher assessment score.
26. However, the Secretariat believes that a particularly important aspect of the purpose of the Small Grants Fund, that of increasing capacity for implementation of the Convention where it is most urgently needed, is not covered by the current formulation of the Stage II assessment form.
27. It is the recent experience of the Secretariat in assessing project proposals that this leads to situations arising where projects of certain types achieve a high assessment score despite not being fully consistent with the purpose of SGF funding, in particular in relation to paragraph 10 of the Guidelines for the Operation of the Small Grants Fund, that: "a Contracting Party . . . should clearly consider how the project fits in with its national planning for the implementation of the Convention".
28. For example, a well-presented project which addresses a specific wetland research issue and whose output is only a research report, but which does not directly lead to enhanced implementation of the Convention, still achieves a high score in Section A of the Stage II assessment.
29. Conversely, there is no opportunity in the Stage II assessment scoring to reflect the extent to which the anticipated outcomes of a project will be increased Convention implementation capacity in the country. Nor is there opportunity to give a high priority for funding to such a project when it is a high implementation priority for the Party in relation to its national planning priorities and targets, as is indicated in paragraph 10 of the SGF Guidelines.
30. So as to address this situation, the Secretariat recommends that the Standing Committee approve the addition of an a new section to the Stage II Assessment Form, concerning "Project significance for Convention implementation". Scoring for such a section might be:
a) The project's outcomes will deliver significantly increased implementation capacity for a high national priority - 10 points
b) The project's outcomes will deliver increase in implementation capacity for a lower national priorit - 5 points
c) The project's outcomes will not directly lead to increased implementation capacity - 0 points
31. In this respect, it would also be appropriate to request the Administrative Authority for the country concerned to indicate the level of national implementation priority afforded the topic of the project, in the Endorsement section of the Project Proposal form.
Funding for "Emergency Assistance" SGF requests
32. The SGF Operational Guidelines indicate that one of the three forms of SGF assistance is "Emergency Assistance" in connection with Ramsar sites which have suffered damage or are in imminent danger of damage as the result of technological developments, pollution, other human interference or natural phenomena such as hurricanes or drought. Emergency assistance of up to SFr. 40,000 can be sought at any time.
33. Since a rapid response to such an emergency request for funding is necessary - the Operational Guidelines indicate that a decision will be made usually within a maximum of three months of the request being received - it follows that some funds should be maintained in the SGF budget line so as to be able to respond in a timely manner to such requests.
34. However, recent practice has been to fund as many as possible of the A-rated projects received in the annual SGF proposal call, and to fund further A-rated projects as and when sufficient funds accrue from project cancellations and other sources. Hence a reserve of SFr. 40,000 is not generally available to respond to emergency assistance requests.
35. To date, six requests from five Contracting Parties for Emergency Assistance, totaling SFr. 54,391, have received SGF funding. These are as follows:
| Country | Year of request | Project | SGF funds provided (SFr) |
| Pakistan | 1991 | Preparation of documentation for new Ramsar sites in Pakistan and strengthening coordination of Ramsar activities in Asia | 10,000 |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | Effect of two grazing densities of cattle on marsh vegetation and resulting waterfowl response | 8,664 |
| Senegal | 1993 | Upkeep of sluice gates of the hydraulic system of the Djoudj National Park | 2,500 |
| Honduras | 1995 | Cadastral surveying of Jeannette Kawas National Park | 5,727 |
| Trinidad & Tobago | 1998 | Filling in of the irrigation channels (Rehabilitation of the Block B Area of Nariva Swamp) | 14,000 |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | Prevention and control of forest fires in the National Refuge of Silvestre Caño Negro | 13,500 |
Annex 1
SMALL GRANTS FUND - FUNDS AVAILABLE
SGF funds available for allocation in 2003
(in Swiss francs, as at 06.11.2003)
| CONFIRMED FUNDS | |
| Surplus from previous year carried forward | 2,450.00 |
| CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED FOR THE 2003 SGF CYCLE: | |
| Austria, Federal Ministry for Land & Forestry, Environment and Water Management | 15,448.00 |
| Germany - Bundesminis. Fur Umwelt, Naturschutz Und Reaktorsicherheit | 46,233.00 |
| Iran, Department of the Environment | 10,000.00 |
| Italy, Ministero del'Ambiente | 31,000.00 |
| Sweden, Sida | 152,040.00 |
| Minus 10% administration fee | (25,472.00) |
| TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION | CHF 231,699.00 |
| AMOUNT REQUIRED TO FUND THE PROJECTS IN CATEGORY A1 | CHF 220,358.00 |
Secretariat assessment of SGF projects and recommendations for funding
Category A1 projects, recommended for immediate funding page 10
Category A2 projects, recommended for funding should
additional funds for the 2003 SGF cycle become available page 13List of projects submitted by countries in Africa page 20
List of projects submitted by countries in Asia page 25
List of projects submitted by countries in Europe page 30
List of projects submitted by countries in the Neotropics page 34
List of projects submitted by countries in Oceania page 39
Only Category A1 and A2 project proposals are included in this public version of the document.
SGF 2003 - Category A1 projects, recommended for immediate funding, listed by Ramsar regions
|
| Country / Project code | Project Title | Amount requested (SFr) | Assessment score | Comments |
| ||||
| | | | | | ||||||
| | Finalization of National Wetlands Policy | 38,125 | 48 | National Wetlands Policy. The Ministry of the Environment has placed the elaboration of a National Wetlands Policy in the governmental program for the first half of 2003. A national commission was established in May 2003, which carried out the elaboration of the draft policy validated technically in July 2003. The general objective of the project is to finalise the policy document with the support of national and international organizations, setting the main national trends for 2015 in order to promote wise use and conservation of wetlands in Note: the proposal indicates a 3-month implementation period for the project, which seems very short – this needs to be clarified with the proposer, as should some budget calculation discrepancies. | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||||
| Lao PDR SGF/03/LA/01 | Preparatory Assistance for Lao PDR’s accession to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands | 25,000 | 57 | Preparatory assistance. This well structured and justified proposal aims to support the Lao Government to accede to the treaty through raising awareness of wetlands values and the role of the Ramsar Convention and analysis of the implications of the joining the Convention. A rapid inventory and selection of potential Ramsar site is envisaged. The proposal will constitute a part of the Mekong Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation Programme, and other funding sources under this programme will contribute to the project. Some budget clarifications are needed. | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||||
| | Evaluation study to support implementation of management plan for the Lower Prut Ramsar site towards wise use and sustainable development | 38,345 | 44 | Wetland assessment & management planning. The proposal aims to provide missing data on the current environmental conditions of Moldova’s | ||||||
| Neotropics | | | | | ||||||
| | National project to assist with the development of a Wetlands Policy | 40,000 | 48 | National Wetlands Policy & CEPA. The project will produce a brochure portraying wetlands in 5 islands in | ||||||
| | | | | | ||||||
| | Institutional capacity building and review of training needs for implementation of the Ramsar Convention in the Republic of the | 39,667 | 47 | Capacity building & legislative and institutional review. The project will help the Republic of the | ||||||
| | Institutional capacity building and review of training needs for implementation of the Ramsar Convention in | 39,221 | 47 | Capacity building & legislative and institutional review. The project will help | ||||||
Category A2 projects, recommended for funding should additional funds become available for the SGF 2003 cycle, listed in order of priority for funding based on assessment score
| Priority for funding | Assess-ment score | Country / | Project Title | Amount requested (SFr) | Comments |
| 1 | 46 | | Ecological assessment of Song-Kul and Chatyr-Kul, | 39,652 | Inventory, assessment & management planning. Baseline study and ecological assessment of the two potential Ramsar sites which are mountain wetlands. Simultaneously the project aims to develop management guidelines for both sites and to work with stakeholders to increase understanding of management practice and the law. A well written, clear and concise proposal with feasible objectives, with a well-presented budget. The |
| 2 | 45 | | Formulation of the National Wetlands Policy for | 40,000 | National Wetlands Policy. The project is set out to carry out phase 2 of the development of Guatemala’s National Wetland Policy. Phase 1 (mainly a consultancy to evaluate the current status about knowledge, institutional capabilities and human resources for the conservation and wise use of wetlands in Note: |
| 3 | 43 | | Enhancement of capacity of women for wise use of wetland resources at selected villages of Tanguar Hoar | 40,000 | Sustainable use – enhancing the role of women. The project aims to raise women’s awareness about their role and capacities, motivation for wise use, and training on alternative livelihood programmes with the ultimate goal of poverty alleviation. The project is intended to be undertaken in five remote deprived villages located at the Ramsar wetland, Tanguar Hoar, which is heavily used by local population, over half of which is female. This is a useful project that addresses an important problem generally neglected of capacity-building to support the role of women. Some budget details need to be further clarified. The project has co-funding from IUCN Bangladesh and Ministry of Environment and |
| 3 | 43 | | Ecotourism development for | 40,000 | Integration of wetland wise use into sustainable development / Local community participation. The proposed project aims at supporting ecotourism within the protected area (a Ramsar site) as well as community-based initiatives in the wider catchment. Whereas there exists a high tourism potential in the area, there are still minimal initiatives in tourism education and awareness, training of local communities, diversification of products, marketing, infrastructure development and community involvement. This project will assist to address all these issues while also being a platform for alternative income generation through ecotourism, thus reducing pressure on the natural landscape. The project is co-financed by Banrock Station ( Note: the proposal indicates that a further CHF 20,000 for full completion of the overall project will be sought from SGF 2004. If the present SGF 2003 proposal is allocated funds it should be made clear that further SGF support cannot at this stage be approved or guaranteed. |
| 3 | 43 | | Preparatory process towards the development of National Wetland Policy for | 40,000 | National Wetland Policy. This project will form the first, consultative phase of developing Nigeria’s National Wetland Policy, needed because the country’s 1999 National Policy on Environment does not address wetland issues. The consultations – three workshops to identify the particular issues and problems which need to be addressed and to reach a consensus “Vision” for the conservation and wise use of Nigeria’s wetlands - will be at community, state and Federal levels to obtain a consensus on the required development options, policy and instruments for policy implementation, to be developed subsequent to this project. Working documents and workshop reports will be drafted by a consultant. An important project, but there is a need to clarify what documents will be prepared before and after each workshop, and it is recommended that the proposed overall project duration of only three months may be too short to ensure preparation of and holding three workshops and draft report preparation and circulation. |
| 6 | 41 | | The status and ecology of Wattled Cranes in Kafue Flats: implication and strategies for the management of Kafue Flats biodiversity | 35,600 | Participatory management. The project goal is to explore the links between hydrology, wetlands and Wattled Cranes and the conservation of biodiversity in Kafue Flats. The project will assessing the status and ecology of Wattled Cranes in Kafue Flats (Ramsar site), relationship between Cranes and various ecological factors that may control their distribution and abundance and their values as an umbrella species for community-based wetlands management and general biodiversity. This well-presented project will culminate in workshops that will bring together national policy makers, stakeholders, and community members with scientists to promote the wise management of biodiversity and subsistence economies in the Kafue Flats. Through field research, GIS analysis, and socio-economic surveys, the project will determine the links between biodiversity, water management, and human welfare in the flats. |
| 7 | 40 | | Management plan for the Ramsar Site Lakes Poopó and Uru Uru, Bolivia (Propuesta para el plan de manejo del sitio Ramsar Lagos Poopó y Uru Uru, Oruro - Bolivia) | 39,989 | Management planning & CEPA. The project aims to elaborate a five-year management plan for the Ramsar site Poopó and Uru Uru lakes. It will be developed by the Wildlife Conservation Society – Note: |
| 8 | 39 | | Inventory and assessment of the natural resources and the ecological character of the Oti-Mandouri watershed and the coastal hydrological network of | 39,973 | Wetland inventory & assessment and Ramsar site designation. The project proposes to study the characteristics of two wetland areas so as to prepare for their Ramsar site designation. The sites are the |
| 9 | 38 | SGF/03/IN/01 | Integrated management planning for conservation and wise use of | 39,688 | Management planning. The proposal will implement a key recommendation of the December 2000 Ramsar Advisory Mission to |
| 9 | 38 | | Pilot project on the development of a practical mechanism and legal scheme of Ramsar sites setting up in | 39,679 | Wetland policy. The project addresses the improvement of the national policy for wetland conservation through the preparation of a methodology for, and listing of, new Ramsar Sites, and the improvement of management capacity of the Islands of Izmail, a potential Ramsar Site upstream of the |
| 11 | 37 | | Wetlands of the crossborder region Gemer-Turnà | 22,000 | CEPA. The project will provide educational materials and programmes in two languages, Slovak and Hungarian, to promote surface wetland conservation in a cross-border region (surroundings of the underground RS). A regional strategy for wetland wise use and a public list of wetlands of regional importance will also be elaborated. The project requests only a small amount of SGF money, focusing on specific CEPA activities, with significant in-country co-financing. The |
| 11 | 37 | | Community-based wetlands assessment in the | 38,812 | Assessment and wise use (community participation). The Tha Chin river, one of Thailand’s most important river basins, has been suffering steady degradation of water quality that causes massive fish kills. The project aims to enhance the input and involvement of civil society in the assessment and monitoring of water quality, so as to increase engagement in implementation of a basin management action plan. This will help to increase awareness about wetlands among the local government, communities and general public. These objectives are proposed to be achieved through consultations, workshop, training and forum establishment for all interested parties, with good follow-up planned. Objectives, activities and outputs are well-presented, but the budget contains limited information and needs to be revised and elaborated prior to funding approval. |
| 11 | 37 | SGF/03/PE/3 | Creation of capacity and instruments for the co-management of Wakarpay Wetland in | 39,932 | Management planning & training. This well-developed and detailed proposal is included within a larger initiative started in 1999 of “Sustainable Development in the Wakarpay Wetland”, which has other projects on sanitation, ecotourism, restoration, etc. The current proposal, a collaboration between Fundación Andes (Peru) and Fundació Natura (Spain), will raise awareness about the values and functions of Wakarpay though a campaign with different sorts of activities. Community facilitators will be picked up from this, and they will be part of the management plan development. Finally, there will be an intensive capacity building training for communities to ensure the proper management and wise use for the future. |
| 14 | 36 | | Development and implementation of a community-based monitoring system of nesting waterbirds in the “Bird Island” of the Delta du Saloum Ramsar site | 39,964 | Participatory management planning and monitoring (Ramsar site). The Island of Birds forms an integral part of the National Park of the delta of Saloum Ramsar site and receives each year more than 110,000 nesting birds. These are threatened by fishermen and by the many disturbances related to uncontrolled tourism. The objective of this project is to reinforce the capacities of the agents and the “écogardes” (young village volunteers) in order to gradually set up a monitoring system for the bird colonies along with the ecotourism activities. A well-defined proposal, with follow-up activities, the project provides a good example of how to promote direct participation of local communities in the conservation of biological resources through the development of management planning and monitoring for a Ramsar site: it involves government officials so as to recognize the need for development of legislation that supports local conservation and wise use interests. |
| 14 | 36 | | Building up a framework for Ramsar Convention implementation in | 40,000 | Wetland legislation/ Education. The project proposes to fill existing gaps of a larger project “Supporting the National Wetlands Strategic Plan” (supported by Dutch funds) by providing manuals and methodology in the fields of legislation, management, and education. Among other results, a management plan for the Kamo-Bakaldino mires Ramsar site and programmes on wetland conservation to be integrated into official school curricula are expected. |
| 14 | 36 | | Management plan as a conservation and wise use strategy for the San Juan River Delta as a Wetland of International Importance (Plan de manejo como estrategia para la conservación y uso racional del Delta del Río San Juan como Humedal de Importancia Internacional) | 40,000 | Management Planning. The Delta del Río |
